CINN has specialists available to evaluate job requirements and susceptibility to back injuries. If you are interested in this service, please contact Lisa Dombro at ldombro@cinn.org
|
Advances in Spine FusionIt is estimated that more than 500,000 bone-grafting procedures are performed annually in the United States with approximately half of these procedures related to spine fusion. The success of spine fusion depends on the creation of long-term spinal stability. Whereas spinal instrumentation devices may provide temporary support, a solid bony union must be achieved to provide permanent stability. Surgeons harvest bone from the iliac crest (hip bone) as an adjunct to spinal instrumentation to aid in the fusion process.
Advancements in bone graft substitutes and bone growth extenders could make the need for harvesting iliac crest autograft obsolete in spine fusion cases. Studies show that the harvesting of iliac crest autograft causes longer surgeries, produces greater blood loss, and often yields chronic hip pain at the donor site. Because of these drawbacks, members of the CINN medical group have been researching bone graft technologies since 1998. Currently, iliac crest cancellous bone graft is considered the gold standard in grafting material for fusion mass formation in the spine, especially in the lumbar region. However, there are disadvantages to using this material. First, there is a limited supply of the autograft. Multilevel fusions require substantial amounts of bone graft, which the iliac crest harvest sites may not be able to accommodate. Second, patients who have had previous graft harvest procedures or who have comprised bone quality are poor candidates for graft harvest. Of concern with this technique is the substantial donor site morbidity associated with all graft harvesting procedures. Persistent (chronic) pain at the hip graft site occurs in approximately one third of patients. Bone graft technologies are clearly the wave of the future. CINN surgeons believe if they can keep from going to the hip, they can decrease recovery time, risk of infection and the pain that is associated with iliac crest autograft. Bottom line: they can get better outcomes. Therapy the Right Way Makes a Difference:
|
![]() |
A recent study demonstrated that a subset of patients suffering from low back pain those with a directional preference had statistically better outcomes with therapy that matched their directional preference. Directional preference (DP) is defined as when certain posture or repeated movements in a single direction (flexion, extension, or side-glide/rotation) eliminate or reduce the back pain. The study showed that patients adhering to a therapy regimen concordant with their DP (Matched Group) had less pain, used less medication and could perform more activities than patients who were taught exercises non-concordant with their DP (Opposite Group) as well as subjects taught commonly prescribed multi-directional, exercises and stretches recommended by established clinical guidelines (Evidence-Based Care Group).
The Matched Group reported significantly greater improvement than the other two groups in all five areas of satisfaction with care:
In summary, exercises concordant with a patients DP significantly improve patient outcomes. The highly experienced and trained physiatrists at CINN play a critical role in prescribing and monitoring conservative therapy, thereby increasing the likelihood of positive patient outcomes.
*Source: Audrey Long, BScPT, Ron Donelson, MD, Tak Fung, PhD, Does it Matter Which Exercise? A Randomized Control Trial of Exercise for Low Back Pain, SPINE 29, no. 23 (2004): 2593-2602.